It works, but it is not mine
The app runs, customers use it, and the whole thing lives inside a platform you pay every month and cannot walk away from. You want the code in a repository with your name on it.
Stuck halfway
Lovable, Base44, Bolt and v0 are very good at getting you to something that runs. They were never built to hold your customers money and data. If that is the wall you just hit, the useful first step is not a quote. It is knowing exactly what you have.
Three versions of the same wall. They need different work, they cost different money, and telling them apart is the whole point of the check.
The app runs, customers use it, and the whole thing lives inside a platform you pay every month and cannot walk away from. You want the code in a repository with your name on it.
With five test users everything was fine. With fifty real ones it is slow, it loses data, or one customer can see another customer's records and nobody noticed until they said so.
You have been warned about permissions, keys or backups, you do not have the background to check whether the warning is fair, and every quote you get opens with the words we would rebuild it.
Both are paid work that ends in a written answer you can act on, with us or with anyone else. The readiness check comes back to you in full if you book a build within 30 days.
Three honest answers. The check says which one applies to you and why, and the price of that path is on the table before you decide anything.
A rebuild is the most expensive answer and the easiest one to sell. That is exactly why the check is paid work that ends in evidence, and why extraction is on the list of outcomes at a fifth of the price.
A number given before anyone has opened the code is a guess wearing a suit. If it turns out to be low, the difference comes back to you later as change requests.
The repository is in your name from the first day, not ours. If you leave in the middle, you leave with everything, including the findings.
If the app is holding up and the honest answer is come back when you have more users, that is what the check will say. It is a cheaper sentence to hear now than in six months.
You export the code into a GitHub repository in your own name, and then rebuild the parts the platform was running for you: the database, the environment variables, the permissions layer and the deploy pipeline. The export on its own is not enough, because the app still depends on services that stay behind. At Zyntari that work is the extraction path, ₪4,000 to ₪8,000, and it starts with a readiness check that confirms it is the right path.
A website check is ₪900. We go through your live site and send back a written list of what is slow, broken, unsafe or invisible to Google, in plain language, with what each fix is worth. Findings come back within 3 working days and they are yours to act on with anyone.
The production readiness check is ₪1,800, for an app built on Lovable, Base44, Bolt or v0. We read the code and the data and tell you what stands between it and paying customers. If you book a build with us within 30 days, the ₪1,800 comes off that build in full.
Usually yes, at least in part. The three honest outcomes are extraction, where the app is fine and only the ownership is wrong, finishing, where the product is right but the engineering under it is not, and a rebuild, where the data model itself is the problem. The check exists so that call is made with evidence rather than a sales instinct.
Then you keep the findings and take them anywhere. The check is written to be useful to another developer, not just to us. We would rather be the people who told you the truth than the people who held your report hostage.
A website check comes back within 3 working days. A production readiness check usually takes about a week, because reading a codebase and its data properly is slower than looking at a running site.
Tell us what you built it with and where it hurts. We will tell you which check fits, or that you do not need one yet.